William C. Meili. Attorney at Law. Security Clearances, Professional Licenses, and Officer Resignations. - return to home page
About Bill Meili Security Clearances Professional Licenses Officer Resignations Resources Contact


IRR Delay and Exemption
Client Testimonial #19 - Straight Talk From a (Former) Army Wife

To "former" army spouses who want to keep it that way…

When my husband, a former Chemical officer, received orders mobilizing him to active duty from the IRR I didn´t know whether to laugh or cry. It seemed too ridiculous to believe. He´d done a deployment to the sandbox. He´d fought a stop-loss to get out and now after two years of us finally getting to be in one spot they were calling him back. I knew it wasn´t personal, he´s just a name on a list, but after 8 years of war and policies like these I couldn´t seem to convince my heart that someone down in headquarters wasn´t sitting there planning how to best screw up the life we had just managed to put back together. I was angry. I used words that proper ladies aren´t supposed to know. I cried. But curses and tears don´t solve problems. People solve problems. People like Bill Meili.

We contacted Bill in November 2008 about a week after my husband received the orders. We had been searching for IRR lawyers and Bill certainly stood out. Nonetheless we were cautious. The last thing we wanted was to pay big bucks to fail. Having fought for an exception to stop-loss in 2006 we knew that we were capable of filing our own case but it would mean a lot of work for us and we had no guarantee that we would win. Bill was upfront and honest with us. He had a 96% success rate, the other 4% were released from service once they reached their mobilization site. He told us that he knew the people at headquarters who would be handling the exception. He told us exactly what he would charge, no hourly fees, no fine print just a flat rate. It was a lot of money and we told him we´d think about it and asked for references. Between the satisfied clients and his record of success we didn´t have to think about it very long.

Obviously we decided it was worth the cost. We are both busy working on our PhDs. What we really could not afford was the lost time and opportunities that mobilization would cause. We needed a successful exception; Bill could and did provide that. Putting together an exception packet is not trivial. We have demanding jobs and little free time. We needed the best possible packet with the least possible work. Bill had the expertise to make that happen. He listened to our story, told us what we needed to do, kept in touch while we worked on our tasks, and put together a 64 page packet for submission. What we couldn´t afford was another year of transition when he returned, of his trying to find a job or to get started with school (again), another year before he was back to normal. What we couldn´t afford was for my husband to lose the opportunity to finish his degree, for him to get hurt, for him to be killed in action. The truth was we couldn´t afford not to hire Bill.

Bill Meili did a great job handling my husband´s case. He was prompt and professional. He knows the regulations inside and out; he knows how to make your packet succeed. It was obvious that he cared about helping the soldiers that he represents and was a pleasure to work with. Most importantly, Bill gets results. Good luck to you all.


Return to testimonials…


Security Clearances Cases

Professional Licenses

Officer Resignations


View all testimonials…


Disclaimer: The information presented on this website is not intended to be legal advice regarding your specific situation and is not intended to replace the work or advice of an attorney. Accessing this website and/or any web pages on this website does not create either an expressed or implied attorney-client relationship. Additionally, past results achieved in our cases -- as reflected in our listed case summaries and testimonials are, of course, not a guarantee of future results. Each case is unique, stands on its own merits, and reference must be made to the specific legal and factual circumstances presented.